http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/30/microsoft-weighs-in-the-future-of-the-web-is-html5/

and

http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2010/04/29/html5-video.aspx


So, I wonder if the Steve/Apple bashing will now move on to MS-bashing? I'm 
guessing not...

Reposted here for posterity, from 
http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/30/microsoft-weighs-in-the-future-of-the-web-is-html5/:

"Where Steve Jobs leads, Microsoft follows -- how's that for shaking up the 
hornet's nest? It's said in jest, of course, but we've just come across a post 
from the General Manager for Internet Explorer, Dean Hachamovitch, and the 
perspective expressed by him on the subject of web content delivery broadly 
agrees with the essay penned by Jobs yesterday on the very same subject. 
Echoing the Apple CEO's words, Hachamovitch describes HTML5 as "the future of 
the web," praising it for allowing content to be played without the need for 
plug-ins and with native hardware acceleration (in both Windows 7 and Mac OS 
X). He goes on to identify H.264 as the best video codec for the job -- so much 
so that it'll be the only one supported in IE9's HTML5 implementation -- before 
turning to the dreaded subject of Flash. 

This is where it gets good, because he literally repeats one of Jobs' six 
pillars of Flash hate: "reliability, security, and performance" are not as good 
as Microsoft would like them. Where Hachamovitch diverges from Apple's messiah, 
however, is in describing Flash as an important part of "a good consumer 
experience on today's web," primarily because it's difficult for the typical 
consumer to access Flash-free content. Still, it's got to be depressing for 
Adobe's crew when the best thing either of the two biggest players in tech has 
to say about your wares is that they're ubiquitous. Wonder how Shantanu Narayen 
is gonna try and spin this one.

P.S. : it's notable that in multiple paragraphs of discussing "the future," 
Microsoft's IE general fails to once mention the fabled Silverlight, itself a 
rich media browser plug-in. Given Silverlight's featured role in the Windows 
Phone 7 infrastructure and other things like Netflix, we doubt it's on the 
outs, but there are sure to be some sour faces greeting Hachamovitch this 
morning."


And from http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2010/04/29/html5-video.aspx

"There’s been a lot of posting about video and video formats on the web 
recently. This is a good opportunity to talk about Microsoft’s point of view.

The future of the web is HTML5. Microsoft is deeply engaged in the HTML5 
process with the W3C. HTML5 will be very important in advancing rich, 
interactive web applications and site design. The HTML5 specification describes 
video support without specifying a particular video format. We think H.264 is 
an excellent format. In its HTML5 support, IE9 will support playback of H.264 
video only.

H.264 is an industry standard, with broad and strong hardware support. Because 
of this standardization, you can easily take what you record on a typical 
consumer video camera, put it on the web, and have it play in a web browser on 
any operating system or device with H.264 support (e.g. a PC with Windows 7). 
Recently, we publicly showed IE9 playing H.264-encoded video from YouTube.  You 
can read about the benefits of hardware acceleration here, or see an example of 
the benefits at the 26:35 mark here. For all these reasons, we’re focusing our 
HTML5 video support on H.264.

Other codecs often come up in these discussions. The distinction between the 
availability of source code and the ownership of the intellectual property in 
that available source code is critical. Today, intellectual property rights for 
H.264 are broadly available through a well-defined program managed by MPEG LA.  
 The rights to other codecs are often less clear, as has been described in the 
press.  Of course, developers can rely on the H.264 codec and hardware 
acceleration support of the underlying operating system, like Windows 7, 
without paying any additional royalty.

Today, video on the web is predominantly Flash-based. While video may be 
available in other formats, the ease of accessing video using just a browser on 
a particular website without using Flash is a challenge for typical consumers. 
Flash does have some issues, particularly around reliability, security, and 
performance. We work closely with engineers at Adobe, sharing information about 
the issues we know of in ongoing technical discussions. Despite these issues, 
Flash remains an important part of delivering a good consumer experience on 
today’s web.

Dean Hachamovitch
General Manager, Internet Explorer"

------------------------------------

--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Alternative FAQ location: 
https://share.acrobat.com/adc/document.do?docid=942dbdc8-e469-446f-b4cf-1e62079f6847
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.comYahoo! 
Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to