Guys, I missed this one... Thank you for your replies... I'll check out the code and see what works. I did end up writing a string parser but I'm now curious to see how RegEx stands up to the task.
Cheers, Nick On 29 July 2010 23:30, Oleg Sivokon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Ouch, actually, it has a flaw, but I'm not sure you need a fix for that, > but it's possible to fix it, if you want. It only checks for the double > quotes, when it checks for the non-quoted words, but it checks for both > single and double quoted groups of words. If you need both single and double > quotes however, the expression is going to be a tid bit longer... but if you > don't need, then it'd be shorter in fact: > > /(".*[^"]")|(\s[^\s"]+(?!\s"))/g > >
