Because the main app isn't ours, it's usually a video player. Our app is designed to be a plugin to other apps.
There are so many flash applications designed that way today for advertisement and other extensions that I really think it eliminates Flex as an option from many projects. --- In [email protected], Alex Harui <aha...@...> wrote: > > No plans at this time. Why can't the main app be Flex? It can load Flash > sub-apps if they don't use the fl.* classes. > > > On 8/18/10 5:52 AM, "guytom19" <guy.to...@...> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > I know this is not formally supported. We found ways around it that work in > most cases but there are always new problems. > > Is there any plan from Adobe to formally support this? > > For us this limitation is a serious problem and we'll probably have to drop > Flex altogether for Flash just because of this (otherwise we really like > developing in Flex better). > > Hope someone from Adobe can reply. > > Guy > > > > > > > -- > Alex Harui > Flex SDK Team > Adobe System, Inc. > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui >
