I have said this before, look at google closure. you code in javascript, annotate your types a compiler which gives you real errors, it has a component library with a well defined livecycle. it is what gmail, docs, goog+ is written in. it is really really good.
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:58 AM, John Fletcher <fletch...@gmail.com> wrote: > ** > > > Out of interest... why does ZK marketing material never mention HTML5? > They used to say "direct RIA" though I can't see that on the site anymore. > I thought HTML5 was the new buzzword and that it would make sense to state > it at least 3 times on every page? > John > 2012/1/17 Ron G <rgri...@sinclairoil.com> > >> ** >> >> >> Hi Joaoak: >> >> You can make the coupling as tight or loose as you want. Each UI object >> can have a client side widget that is primarily the appearance, and a >> server side component that should contain the more complex logic. So, you >> can hide as much as want by placing it in the server side component as Java >> code, or keep in the client side widget as JS. In fact, since you indicate >> you are moving to HTML5, ZKoss actually might be a good choice, since it >> relies heavily on jQuery, which is considered a favorite HTML5 library. The >> difference is ZK lets you choose where client side logic is stored - as JS >> on the client or Java on the server. Another type of HTML5 approach won't >> offer that. >> >> Ron >> > > -- j:pn \\no comment