Never mind Srinivas, the flex development should go on and I always wish more UI developer join the force. :)
________________________________ From: Srinivas Sandur Madhu Murthy <s.m.srini...@gmail.com> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 12:47 PM Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Moving my command-line development to FlashBuilder4.6 - confused. Rishi Tandon, Chill Bro, again you are proving me that you don't read your emails completely :)!!. By the way as you said it's free forum, so I thought I can freely suggest someone & I did it for you! hope you understand. I guess this 4th time I have seen you suggesting something else where as the problem was something else & I have also seen that you have come back and gave proper answer later too. If you read my email properly I was just suggesting you read-up entire email so that you understand the problem and help more people!!! I never intended to be RUDE or HURT your ego!.. it's just suggestion, once again I honestly believe, if you read your emails completely, you will be more helpful to community!!....:) :) On Jan 30, 2012, at 10:43 PM, Tandon, Rishi wrote: > > >Srinivas, don't say other to do WHAT if they are following the basic >Netiquette? >These are the following reason why you can't give tongue to community member: >1. You are not authorized as I think you are not the admin of the group. >2. I am not getting paid to deliver the solution. >3. This is a free forum and you are free to post solution or your opinion. >4. I love to debug the code and specify the exact solution if I am aware of. > > >Dan, >To be more specfic, please refer to the attach IntegratedEncoder.FXP project >where I have merged your controller logic into a single MXML file as the basic >rule to create a flex application is to have only one Applicatin container as >root. > > >About the Application container >The first tag in an MXML application is either the <s:Application> tag for the >Spark application container, or the <mx:Application> >tag for an MX application container. The application container then becomes >the default container for any content that you add to your application. > > >In IntegratedEncoder.mxml, the <s:Application> is the root tag, whereas >IntegratedEncoderController.as is extending the <mx: Application>. > > >Regards, >Rishi Tandon > > > >________________________________ > From: Srinivas Sandur Madhu Murthy <s.m.srini...@gmail.com> >To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com >Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 10:08 AM >Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Moving my command-line development to >FlashBuilder4.6 - confused. > > > >Rishi, > > >Please read the complete email before you ask for something. I understand you >like to help, but please read-up completely, understand problem & then ask for >things to help more. > > >Dan, > > >Whether you use Command-line or Flex Builder it doesn't matter, you always >will try to compile 1 application in entire project, unless you have two or >more applications in the project. Correct me if I am wrong, as my >understanding goes you have EncoderController.as file which has class >definition for "EncoderController" class which extends I guess from >Application/Sprite. I guess this is the reason your project's main mxml file >has root node as <local:EncoderController...../>. Now if you are using Flex >Builder, normally the main application mxml file which Flex Builder Template >creates has root node as s:Application. In your case, after that mxml is >created all you need to do just replace that default auto generated code by >your old mxml contents & include EncoderController.as in the src directory, >which should work fine for you. > > >FX:Script tag is used in mxml to just include AS scripts which doesn't have >class definitions. Normally these AS files would have methods, variables etc >required or used in MXML file. I hope you know that any MXML file can use >fx:script tag and write the AS scripts stuff required in that particular MXML. >Treat this MXML+AS script as class. > > >The reason why you getting error in first place is, the MXML file which you >have is extending from spark::Application [hence root tag as s:Application] & >included AS file has definition of a class which also extends from >spark:Application. > > >Writing code and compiling with SDK using compile time shouldn't be different >from using Flex Builder. In-fact it gives more flexibility & user >friendliness. Please read-up more on using Flex Builder, should help you >convert your application more easily. > > >Let me know if you need more help. > > >Thanks >Srinivas > >On Jan 30, 2012, at 4:11 AM, Tandon, Rishi wrote: > > >> >> >>Dan, send over your mxml and as file here. >>There could be many reasons for the exception: >>1. Compatible with the sdk. Try to change to flex sdk 3.2 or 3.6 >>2. Namespace inclusion. >>In you code, the namespace is pointed to "http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml"; >>Whereas, in sdk 4 onwards, we are using three namespace: >> xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"; >> xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark" >> xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx" >> >> >> >> >> >> >>Regards, >>Rishi Tandon >> >> >> >> >> >>________________________________ >> From: Dan M <d...@streemit.net> >>To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com >>Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2012 12:54 AM >>Subject: [flexcoders] Moving my command-line development to FlashBuilder4.6 - >>confused. >> >> >> >>I downloaded and installed the Mac version of Flash Builder 4.6. There >>is enough development work yet to be done on my project I figured that >>having an IDE to work in might make life easier. >> >>The project was originally written as an mxml file (Encoder.mxml) and an >>ActionScript file (EncoderController.as). The mxml file refers to the >>ActionScript file by starting out with : >><local:EncoderController xmlns:mx="http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml"; >>layout="absolute" >>xmlns:local="*" >>height="800" width="800" >>backgroundColor="#FFFFFF" >>backgroundAlpha="0"> >> >>On the Mac I selected "New" then "Flex Project" and named the project >>"IntegratedEncoder". That got me an mxml file. I then copied the .as >>file over from my other working environment, renamed it >>"IntegratedEncoderController.as", changed the class name appropriately, >>and modified the new mxml file Flash Builder made for me to include >>"<fx:Script source="IntegratedEncoderController.as" />" >> >>When I save the file the editor windows for >>IntegratedEncoderController.as shows an error on the line in which I >>import flash.media.Camera. The line with the error and the lines >>surrounding it are: >> >>import flash.display.*; >>import flash.events.MouseEvent; >>import flash.events.NetStatusEvent; >>import flash.external.ExternalInterface; >>-->import flash.media.Camera; <--- >>import flash.media.Microphone; >>import flash.media.Video; >>import flash.net.navigateToURL; >>import flash.net.NetConnection; >> >>The indicate line is the one with the error messages. The error messages >>associated with it are: >>1084: Syntax error: expecting identifier before leftbrace >>1131: Classes must not be nested >> >>I also get an error indicated in when I declare a variable of type Camera: >>private var camera:Camera; >>The error message associated with this line is another occurence of >>1131: Classes must not be nested >> >>I've also got some other error messages, indicated in the editor with >>yellow question marks. In the constructor for the class: >>public function EncoderController() >>{ >>---> addEventListener(FlexEvent.APPLICATION_COMPLETE,mainInit); <--- >>} >>the indicated line is marked with "Call to a possibly undefined method >>addEventListener". >> >>In the mainInit method, I then have two lines: >>stage.align = "TL"; >>stage.scaleMode = "noScale"; >>both marked with Access of undefined property stage >> >>The code I copied over from my other machine compiles just fine using >>the SDK and it runs fine. Why is Flash Builder giving these errors? It >>looks like it is having problems importing flash.media.Camera and >>appears confused by addEventListener. Have I done something with my >>project setup that is screwing with Flash Builder? I'm thinking I'd like >>to be able to do the rest of this project development in FB, but this >>isn't looking very promising so far. >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >
