The labels aren't the problem. I don't want the third level (the Date objects) at all.
The way I handled the issue of labels was to create a get label() function that returns the name field from each VO (since they have different variable names for their 'label' fields). See my previous post to see how I got the date objects to not show up at all. --- In [email protected], Martin Louis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > tree needs data like following so try using the same VO throughout the nodes > > +label > - label > - label > > i suggest you create single VO that includes all the attributes of CategoryVO and ItemVO like this > > label:String -----------------> name and title are same > > id:Number > > arItems:Array > > start:Date > > if you chaneg "label" to any other string then the "labelField" property of tree should be set . > > > this id becoz you can assign only one labelField for a tree if you give different labelFields then it will behave like this > > ninjascience <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Follow up: > > I tried makig the Date field private in my value object. It still > shows up as a tree node, and an alert call that references it still > shows the data! So much for privacy! > > --- In [email protected], "ninjascience" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > m using an array of ValueObjects that contain arrays of ValueObjects > > as a DataProvider for a tree component. Everything was working just > > fine until I added a Date field to one of my Value objects. Now the > > tree thinks that they should be nodes on the tree. > > > > My VOs are like this > > > > CategoryVO > > title:String > > id:Number > > arItems:Array > > > > ItemVO > > name:String > > id:Number > > start:Date > > > > I want my tree to look like this > > > > +SomeCategory > > ++Item A > > ++Item B > > +OtherCategory > > ++Item C > > ++Item D > > > > but it looks like this... > > +SomeCategory > > ++Item A > > +++[object Object], 1, , Fri Nov 4 00:00:00 GMT-0800 2005, null > > ++Item B > > +++[object Object], 1, , Fri Nov 4 00:00:00 GMT-0800 2005, null > > +OtherCategory > > ++Item C > > +++[object Object], 1, , Fri Nov 4 00:00:00 GMT-0800 2005, null > > ++Item D > > +++[object Object], 1, , Fri Nov 4 00:00:00 GMT-0800 2005, null > > > > Is there anyway to specifiy which objects get included as tree nodes > > and which dont? I want to add a third level of composition within > > each Item node. > > thanks, > > -- > > Ryan P. Miller > > > > > > > > > > -- > Flexcoders Mailing List > FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt > Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com > > > > --------------------------------- > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS > > > Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. > > > --------------------------------- > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free. > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/nhFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
