Hi Steve,

Thanks for your thoughts.

I realize it isn't the real problem in my experience with Cairngorm.
In fact, I'm looking for a good way to build RIAs with Flex in a Team.
For instance, I'd like to distribute some features or Use Cases to
different programmers.

Maybe my mistake was to define a folder structure with the Team in
mind. In this case, the high-level of granularity is probably a
collateral effect. There is some bad smell here.

So, I'm looking for a good way to build RIAs with Flex in a Team. I
use Cairngorm and I can see some points where it helps me a lot. But I
wish I have some other thoughts about that, even it is related to the
Cairngorm or not.


Thanks!
Beck Novaes


On 2/1/06, Steven Webster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Beck,
>
> I'd err towards Scenario 2 that you described; that's what has worked
> for us typically.  I'm not sure what you mean by "Use Case" in your
> case, but that would be a pretty high-level of granularity for me.
>
> I'd probably have a single controller, and I'd have a single
> ModelLocator but introduce extra hierarchy into the commands, business
> and VO packages as needs be.
>
> However, to be honest ... This isn't the kind of thing I'd advocate as
> "it must be done this way".  Common sense is that your source should be
> easy to navigate, easy to reuse, maintainable - and if you're achieving
> those goals, you're winning IMHO.
>
> For me, this is one of those academic debates where the debate is lifted
> as soon as it's a real-world implementation and we can make informed
> common-sense decisions.
>
> So - your approach(es) look good to me.
>
> Help ?
>
> Steven
>
> --
> Steven Webster
> Practice Director (Rich Internet Applications)
> Adobe Consulting
> Westpoint, 4 Redheughs Rigg, South Gyle, Edinburgh, EH12 9DQ, UK
> p: +44 (0) 131 338 6108
> m: +44 (0) 7917 428 947
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Beck Novaes
> > Sent: 01 February 2006 13:14
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [flexcoders] Cairngorm Folder Structure
> >
> > What do you think is the best way to structure folders in a
> > big Cairngorm Application?
>
>
> --
> Flexcoders Mailing List
> FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
> Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to