On 2/17/06, Roger Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The bits are in the client's hands, and they need some way of
> decrypting
> > them to run the bits, so fundamentally, no matter how many
> levels of
> > encoding you add, you're just looking at obfuscation.
> >
> > -rg
> >
>
> Hmmm.... Not the answer I was looking for, but similar to
> what I was thinking.
>
> BTW, We're using Flex 1.5. You mentioned some ways of
> obfuscating the code....
Google for "actionscript obfuscator".
-rg
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
--
j:pn
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
SPONSORED LINKS
| Web site design development | Computer software development | Software design and development |
| Macromedia flex | Software development best practice |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
