The first one shouldn't compile because it
violates the one-externally-visible-declaration-per-file rule of mxmlc; both public
class Component and (internal) class Utility would be visible to code in other
files, as long as it was within package com.teotigraphix.com.
In the second example, putting Utility
outside the package statement makes it visible only to code in the same file.
- Gordon
Hello,
Does anybody know what or if there is a difference in the following; (Talking
about the Utility class placement)
----------------------------------------------------------
package com.teotigraphix.core
{
public class Component
{
public function Component()
{
}
}
class Utility
{
}
}
AND ....
----------------------------------------------------------
package com.teotigraphix.core
{
public class Component
{
public function Component()
{
}
}
}
class Utility
{
}
I noticed this changed in the change from alpha to beta. What is the
difference, either way the compiler dosn't complain. I understand namespaces
but, is this what would change for the last example? I have tried to look in
the AS3 docs but, they are not finished yet ;-)
Peace, Mike
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
