What if you mark them transient? Does that help?
-- Dave Wolf Cynergy Systems, Inc. Macromedia Flex Alliance Partner http://www.cynergysystems.com Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: 866-CYNERGY --- In [email protected], "allister_dickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Graham, > > Thanks for the reply. It helped solve some follow up issues after I > overcame the below problem. The cause of this problem was the fact > that the action script class representing the java object was never > specifically referenced in the action script code because arrays were > being passed back and then being set on the Model object (ie no > casting was needed). Once the VO Action Script class was imported > into the command class then everything started working as per normal. > Now in hindsight this makes sense because if there is no direct > reference to the VO then flash never loads the class, therefore the > Object.registerClass is never performed meaning no link exists > between the VO and Java Object. If there is no link then when the > object gets past back to a Remote Object flex server treats it like a > ASObject rather than the required Java Object. > > This question is related to your reply. Is there some way of telling > flex server not to pass final Static fields from Java to Flash? I > have worked out how to do it from flash to Java using > _global.ASSetPropFlags, but I would prefer that they are not sent to > flash to start with. > > Thanks Again, > > Allister > > --- In [email protected], "Graham, Jason" <jason_graham@> > wrote: > > > > You have something in your class that the serialization layer is > having > > a problem with. Make sure in your class you don't have any static > final > > fields. This will cause a problem because the serialization layer > going > > from java to flex sends these fields across, when you send the > object > > back to java it blows up trying to set those fields. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of allister_dickson > > Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 12:16 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [flexcoders] Remote Objects in Flex 1.5 Problem > > > > > > I am integrating a Flex frontend with a J2EE backend using > Cairngorm > > Framework and RemoteObjects. I am able to successfully retrieve > > information from my java services, but when they are sent back > after > > changes are made to the Java Service doesn't always recognise them > > as the correct type of Object, therefore causing a cast exception. > > > > After turning on debugging and logging in both the flex client and > > Java Server I have found the following things. > > > > 1) The flex server interprets the objects correctly when passing > > back the results. All the Typed objects are as expected see log > > below as an example: > > [0] = (Typed Object > > #1 'au.com.myplan.domain.financial.FinancialDefaultCategory') > > financialCategoryType = (Typed Object > > #5 'au.com.myplan.domain.financial.FinancialCategoryType') > > defaultAccountingTypeId = null > > selected = true > > _remoteClass > > = "au.com.myplan.domain.financial.FinancialCategoryType" > > description = "" > > isNested = true > > new = true > > name = "Budget Income" > > id = 1.0 > > accountingTypeId = null > > _remoteClass > > = "au.com.myplan.domain.financial.FinancialDefaultCategory" > > new = true > > name = "Dividends" > > subDefaultCategories = (Array #6) > > id = 43.0 > > > > 2) When the object is viewed in the flex debugger only the > > associated object financialCategoryType has _remoteClass set and > the > > parent object (FinancialDefaultCategory). > > > > 3) After changes are made and sent back to the Java Service the log > > only shows that it only understands the associated object and not > > the parent. > > [0] = (Object #6) > > id = 43.0 > > subDefaultCategories = (Array #7) > > name = "Dividends Changed" > > new = false > > accountingTypeId = null > > financialCategoryType = (Typed Object > > #8 'au.com.myplan.domain.financial.FinancialCategoryType') > > defaultAccountingTypeId = null > > selected = false > > _remoteClass > > = "au.com.myplan.domain.financial.FinancialCategoryType" > > description = "" > > isNested = false > > new = false > > name = "Budget Income" > > id = 1.0 > > parentFinancialDefaultCategory = null > > selected = true > > > > 4) When the Java Service receives the object it is of type ASObject. > > > > > > I have read and followed any examples I can find on the net, but I > > haven't found a way of forcing the Flex client to associate the > > objects recieved as the correct Action Script Class. The java log > > messages give the impression that it is configured correctly but > > when the object is in the flex client the _remoteClass is not set > > for the parent object. I have made sure that the ActionScript > > Classes have been register correctly (public static var regClass = > > Object.registerClass > > > ("au.com.myplan.domain.financial.FinancialDefaultCategory",au.com.myp > > lan.domain.financial.FinancialDefaultCategory);). > > > > Any help resolving this problem would be appreciated. > > > > Regards, > > > > Allister > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Flexcoders Mailing List > > FAQ: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt > > Search Archives: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
