The use of the multiple targeted build scripts (unittests, app, or all) makes sense.
My question then would be, is the speed of compilation a main factor in the choice of compilation methods? It sounds like there are other factors that depend on the development teams practices that weigh in the to decision then just speed of compilation. In regards to just the factor of speed, on an application with roughly 50 .mxml and 50+ .as files whats the typical compile times? 20s-30s? Renaun --- In [email protected], "Johannes Nel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > this is both for develpers (developer chooses which target to compile - > unitests,app or all) and our continues integration server. we only deploy a > swf to production. > > On 3/22/06, Renaun Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Thanks Johannes for insight. > > > > Is this what you do as a developer on a dev box? Or only on the major > > builds on the deployment (staging/production) servers? > > > > Renaun > > > > --- In [email protected], "Johannes Nel" <johannes.nel@> > > wrote: > > > > > > hear hear on what david says. using ant we > > > update from svn > > > build unit tests app using mxmlc, if all tests pass > > > use mxmlc to build app > > > > > > so yeah it has its benefits :) > > > > > > so it is critical to the process as > > > On 3/22/06, Dave Wolf <gatorj24@> wrote: > > > > > > > > That depends what you mean by better. In Flex 1.5 you will find very > > > > quickly that the JIT server compiler leaks memory very badly and wont > > > > work with an application of any real size. For any kind of serious > > > > application the server compilation simply wont work for you. > > > > > > > > We use mxmlc called from autoamted ANT builds. We're pretty attament > > > > about it all. We have a very well designed build and source control > > > > process that has made real impacts on the quality and reliability of > > > > our solutions. > > > > > > > > Yeah, performance isnt stunning, but given that its a two pass > > > > compilation thats not shocking either. > > > > > > > > We're hoping for some marked improvement in Flex2. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Dave Wolf > > > > Cynergy Systems, Inc. > > > > Macromedia Flex Alliance Partner > > > > http://www.cynergysystems.com > > > > > > > > Email: dave.wolf@ > > > > Office: 866-CYNERGY > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Renaun Erickson" <renaun@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > After some more reading I am under the assumption that for > > development > > > > > of Flex 1.5 apps its better to use the Java web server access to > > > > > compile with caching on. Is this correct? > > > > > > > > > > Renaun > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Renaun Erickson" <renaun@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > ## This post is in regard to Flex 1.5 ## > > > > > > > > > > > > I have finally got around to trying out mxmlc and fastmxmlc > > with a xml > > > > > > build script. The purpose was to see if it was faster to use > > mxmlc to > > > > > > compile on my development environment versus using the web server > > > > > > (accessing the mxml by a url). > > > > > > > > > > > > I am not seeing a big difference in compile time between the two > > > > > > methods. I tried RSL's but dont think they are setup correctly. > > > > > > > > > > > > My big question is how do I get my compile times down on my local > > > > > > development machine? > > > > > > > > > > > > Renaun > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Flexcoders Mailing List > > > > FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt > > > > Search Archives: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > j:pn > > > http://www.lennel.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Flexcoders Mailing List > > FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt > > Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > j:pn > http://www.lennel.org > -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
