|
May I ask your rationale for avoiding interfaces? If
you use concrete implementations, you'll generally need to do a lot more
recompilation..
-rg
Tom,
Partitioning of the
application is the must, and thanks to the advise from Roger, it is not hard.
However, I would advocate to not to use interfaces, but rather use small
applications and shared framework AND loosely bounded resources for
UI/server interaction code approach. I should provide link to an article on
the subject next week.
Thank you,
Anatole Tartakovsky
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 4:19
PM
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Large App
Architecture
Yes, it can. Multiple SWFs.
Tradeoffs are increased potential for
errors, a bit more architecture
work needed up front, and the potential
that the Flex frameworks isn't
fully designed for this case, so you
might run into some tricky (but not
unsolvable) issues. (It works
pretty well for pure-AS
apps.)
My suggestion is to start building your app with interfaces
connecting
the modules, and try to avoid concrete implementation
dependencies.
After that, by the time we ship, I should have an
article out describing
how to set things up.
-rg
>
-----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
>
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Sobut
> Sent:
Monday, March 27, 2006 11:16 AM
> To:
[email protected]
> Subject: [flexcoders] Large App
Architecture
>
> We're looking at possibly developing a large
Flex application
> which could have 50+ screens
> and lots of
sub views on those screens.
>
> We will have users with various
connection speeds, including
> dialup, so we'd like to minimize
> initial download time of the app.
>
> We also have the
situation where some user types use only a
> subset of the
screens.
>
> Our concern is that deployed as a monolithic app,
initial
> load times could be painful over
> slow
connections.
>
> Can a Flex application be architected so that
modules would
> be programatically loaded as
> needed?
Would this be done as separate .swf's? Are there
> tradeoffs in
this type of approach?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
Tom
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
Flexcoders Mailing List
> FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
>
Search Archives:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
- RE: [flexcoders] Large App Architecture Roger Gonzalez
-
