So any one has idea regarding flex-2 , in terms of memory and as described above thread, the hardware specs....
 
Jignesh

 
On 3/29/06, Mika Kiljunen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi,

If you have a complex app that processed and displays _lot of data _ then memory could be an issue. We run our app on IE and it eats a big bunch of memory when lot of data is loaded, which is of course a natural result. This causes slowdown on performance. Also many flex components like datagrid slow down a great deal when lot of data is populated on them. So watch out for memory. Also processor performance effects a lot on usability with Flex 1.5.

 

-Mika

 


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of george_lui
Sent: 29. maaliskuuta 2006 10:08
To: [email protected]
Subject: [flexcoders] Hardware requirements for Flex performance

 

Hi,

Anyone here have any comments on how complexities in your Flex app can
affect the performance?  We have an app where we're fetching and
displaying a lot of data.  We're seeing the behavior where if we
select too much of something to display, it won't display everything.
A collegue hypothesized that the hardware specs of the machine might
play a factor.  We have customer that could conceivably be using
slower machines that have 256MB of RAM.

So I guess I'm wondering if any of you would know how hardware specs
might play into the performance of your flex app (or more specifically
the flash browser plugin I guess).  Is there a relationship between
the complexities of your app and the hardware resources it might require?

We're using Flex 1.5 btw.

TIA,
George







--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com




YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS






--
jignesh dodiya


--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com




YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to