It is a long-term goal to have MXML only require some interfaces and not the current framework implementation. However we won't accomplish that for Flex 2.0.
Matt -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of bussesven Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 11:30 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Using mxml without flex framework (Flex 2 Beta 1 and 2) Yes and if i would actually buy Flex Builder, i really would like to use the tool to my own needs. When making up the architecture of my app, i want to be able to decide a - if i want to use the flex framework b - if i want to use mxml or if i just want to make an actionscript project And i want to be able to make those two decisions separately. --- In [email protected], "Johannes Nel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > in the context of the current topic i still don't get what you mean. paying > for an ide is not a problem, its to be expected. > > about the topic at hand: it would have been nice if i could have used mxml > to layout any type of app. > -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
