Thanks Steven, Perhaps my problem is that I wasn't able to utilize the services.mxml as Cairngorm intended. I'm using webServices. Since I couldn't find a working example of how to invoke different web service operations from the delegate (with paramaters), I decided to use an AS class to make the remote call. As a side note, I like this approach a little better, since I dont have to hard code the paramater tags in the service (one less place to maintain the VO). I simply pass the VO to the service. Since I diverged from Cairngorm at that point, I wasn't able to get the Responder to work. This may be where I went wrong. Since I added event listeners to the web service class from the delegate, instead of passing the event listeners through with a responder, the listeners persisted. I could manually remove the event listeners, but wouldn't a delegate instance still exist for each call; thus representing a memory leak? Do you have a better suggestion for this? I would like to keep the application as pure Cairngorm if possible. As a side note, thank you very much for your 6-part article. It was a hard learning curve, but well worth it.
Regards, Tim Hoff --- In [email protected], "Steven Webster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We've never made delegates singletons - since typically these are > reusable proxies to server-side business logic, and there has never been > a need to have the "same instance of the singleton" between different > command invocations. > > Doesn't mean making a delegate a singleton is wrong; it's > application-specific I guess, and it's a freedom you have as a developer > using Cairngorm, to make these decisions. > > Best, > > Steven > > Steven Webster > Practice Director (Rich Internet Applications) > Adobe Consulting > Westpoint, 4 Redheughs Rigg, South Gyle, Edinburgh, EH12 9DQ, UK > p: +44 (0) 131 338 6108 > m: +44 (0) 7917 428 947 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Hoff > > Sent: 17 April 2006 19:08 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm2 Commands and Singletons > > > > Making the delegate a singleton solved the problem. Thank > > you very much for the insight. > > > > - TH > -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
