You can't open many HTTP based connections from any client. Off the top of my head I think HTTP 1.1 suggests 2 connections and HTTP 1.0 suggested 4 connections. The flash player can't change this - it's up to what is configured on each OS.
I see the batching as desired behavior because over a real connection the network time is non-trivial and a batch makes that much more manageable for lots of quickly made requests. -----Original Message----- From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of sof4real03 Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 9:29 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Do RemoteObject results still not operate in parallel? Thanks Matt, this may be an ignorant question, but why would be a desired behavior? It seems like a more desired behavior would be how HTTPService or WebService responds is more desired... Thanks, Sof --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Matt Chotin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm pretty sure we consider this desired behavior. I will file an > enhancement to turn off the batching but I doubt it will make it into > Flex 2. > > Matt > > -----Original Message----- > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of sof4real03 > Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 3:01 PM > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Do RemoteObject results still not operate in > parallel? > > Yes, that was the workaround. Is there look into changing the behavior > of NetConnection in the player before Flex is released for production? > > By the way, thanks for the code tip. > > - Sof > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Farland" <pfarland@> wrote: > > > > Was that the workaround that involved using a unique endpoint URL to > > avoid connection sharing? > > > > If so, in FDS 2 you could create a new AMFChannel and assign it as > part > > of a service's channelSet:ChannelSet property. > > > > import mx.messaging.ChannelSet; > > import mx.messaging.Channel; > > import mx.messaging.channels.AMFChannel; > > > > ... > > > > var channelSet:ChannelSet = new ChannelSet(); var channel:Channel = > > new AMFChannel("my-amf", > > "http://localhost:8700/cfusion/messagebroker/amf";); > > channelSet.addChannel(channel); > > remoteObject.channelSet = channelSet; > > > > ... > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On > > Behalf Of sof4real03 > > Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 4:26 PM > > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Do RemoteObject results still not operate > > in parallel? > > > > If RemoteObjects results do not come back in parallel then how would > one > > implement the workaround Peter Ent posted since the "endpoint" > > attribute is no longer supported in Flex 2. > > > > Thanks, > > Sof > > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Farland" <pfarland@> wrote: > > > > > > It isn't up to the Flex RemoteObject feature... it's how the flash > > > player NetConnection works with AMF requests (and continues to > > > work > in > > > > > FP 8.5). > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > On Behalf Of sof4real03 > > > Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 3:15 PM > > > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > > > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Do RemoteObject results still not > > > operate > in > > > > > parallel? > > > > > > Does anyone know if this is a still an outstanding design of > > > RemoteObjects and AMF? > > > > > > Much thanks, > > > Sof > > > > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "sof4real03" <soubraham2@> wrote: > > > > > > > > I've come across an article by Peter Ent regarding how AMF > > > > results > > > > > using RemoteObjects do not return in parallel, but wait until > > > > all requests are completed. He also posted a workaround. I was > > > > just wondering if this is still a valid workaround or has the > > > > design > been > > > > > > revamped with the Data Services? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Sof > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Flexcoders Mailing List > > > FAQ: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt > > > Search Archives: > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Flexcoders Mailing List > > FAQ: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt > > Search Archives: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > -- > Flexcoders Mailing List > FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt > Search Archives: > http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com > Yahoo! Groups Links > -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
