|
I've spent 3 years learning the MX 2004 / 8 v2
component framework, and it makes sense to me... most of it. I never cared
for the DataSet and binding classes, but everything else has allowed me to
create applications I couldn't have without knowlege of using them and the rest
of the framework.
Macromedia made a strong effort to listen to the
community's feedback upon it's release, and eventually documented it. Too
little too late for some of us, but at least they did what they said they were
going to do. Upon the release of Flex 1, they had apparently learned from
that mistake because the Flex 1 documentation for components was top notch
compared to Ellipsis (Flash 7.2). This put up or shutup attitude was nice
to see; for everyone who asked a question that was directly answerable from the
docs, people on the Flexcoders list pointed them to RTFM manual, and it
was good to see they had faith in what they produced. Upon reading
the documentation for Beta 2, and seeing Sho's blog post on the revamp for Beta
3, I think Adobe is continuing that quality in documentation.
Granted, documenting the API for a List component
and documenting not only how to USE that List component, but USING that List
component with OTHERS are 3 totally different things. I think we are
getting the latter after reading pages about utilizing item renderers, and
UIComponent API changes. Granted, you can't judge it yet since it's not
done, nor is the source code publicly released in this build to compare and
contrast.
While I personally think it's up to the developer
to invest their own personal time to learn the framework on their own, I would
still prefer docs written that help get us up to speed as soon as possible to
provide a better cost to time invested ratio, ecspecially since the scope of
this component framework is much larger than v1 & v2 combined.
----- Original Message -----
From: Michael
Schmalle
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 10:20 AM
Subject: [flexcoders] Flex2 :: 3rd party Components :: Adobe
comments Adobe says they want a rich 3rd party componenty community. I have one question; Is Adobe going to give developers a road map of their framework ? Macromedia severly failed when trying to proliferate those quasi components named v2. Us developers spent 6 months figuring the rats nest out(in the end it didn't make any sense anyway). Do we Flex2 component devs get a road map(whitepapers) of the framework or do we have to waste 6 months learning code alogrithms when the source for the flex2 framework comes out? Peace, Mike PS This comment stems from the fact Manish just pointed out the dropdownFactory of the ComboBox. Which is modular development at its best! I mean, looking at the 10,000 pages of api docs I do see it listed but common! You have to have something that your internal devs use. (this could have saved me hours) -- What goes up, does come down. -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
- [flexcoders] Flex2 :: 3rd party Components :: Adobe comme... Michael Schmalle
- Re: [flexcoders] Flex2 :: 3rd party Components :: Ad... JesterXL
- Re: [flexcoders] Flex2 :: 3rd party Components :... Michael Schmalle
- RE: [flexcoders] Flex2 :: 3rd party Componen... Matt Chotin

