Claudia,

I think I understand you problem,

but..

You say you need to know when the property is first initialized by the mxml tag.

Well, the setter with the boolean will take care of that without the Bindable tag. So your saying you need to catch a change 'after' the property has been initialized???

This is where I am gettng confused with your problem.

If you are using the boolean you don't need any bindable meta. I thought I read

> the problem is that I really don't want to check
each time the value changes, I only wan't to know _when_ I have access
to the value assigned on the MXML for the first time.

This is where I am getting confused with what you are saying.

Am I missing something you said?

Peace, Mike


On 6/13/06, Claudia Barnal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> why do you need it bindable if you are only checking it once? (IE if you used a setter with a boolean flag) ?

I really wish I didn't need to bind, but that is the only way I can
catch a change, after the _first_ change I unvatch the property. For
some reason I get the same warning when using the setter with a
boolean flag(???).

I also have very little experience with this kind of problem :)




--
What goes up, does come down. __._,_.___

--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com





SPONSORED LINKS
Web site design development Computer software development Software design and development
Macromedia flex Software development best practice


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




__,_._,___

Reply via email to