Re: [flexcoders] Re: Uh oh Ajax...

[John C. Bland II]

Well, I'd say it is good for Flex but only due to the scare factor. If JS starts getting hit with more and more viruses Ajax will become a liability more than anything. This is one of the reasons some network admins shut off JS.
On 6/14/06, sourcecoderia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:









  


    
            And yet another, this seems to be a good? Thing for Flex?
But very bad for ajax.

QUOTE. "Just wait. Ajax is just asking for it."

http://www.informationweek.com/software/showArticle.jhtml?
articleID=188703194

Sure glad swf is compiled. (but still not un breakable)

jason

--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Tom Chiverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 14 June 2006 12:21, John C. Bland II wrote:
> > AJAX IS _javascript_
> 					^ and XML
> 
> :--)
> 
> -- 
> Tom Chiverton
> 


      

    
    










-- John C. Bland II"I do what I can do when I can do it." - Chris Tucker, Money Talkshttp://www.gotoandstop.org
 - Home of FMUG.az

__._,_.___





--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com








   



    


  
  
    SPONSORED LINKS
  
          
                  
            
        Web site design development
      
                      
        Computer software development
      
                      
        Software design and development
      
              
                        
            
        Macromedia flex
      
                      
        Software development best practice
      
                    
           
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___