Hey Jean-Luc,
I'm in meetings all week, so you won't get much email
response from me for rest of week.....
In the release notes, we talk of this, and we'll blog of
our intentions shortly ... but yes, at the end of the day the beta, and the
feedback we had internally and from the community, drove a number of discussions
that make us believe that it's a better practice - as we had in Cairngorm 0.99 -
to keep a separation of Cairngorm events from other events.
Perhaps one of the other members of the team will be able
to elaborate further; if not, I'll try and blog something on our design
decisions later next week.
Alex Uhlmann I believe is going to blog something that will
allow you to achieve a simpler migration path, but our expectation is that it's
not the most painful thing you're going to have to do.
And it was a _beta_ :-)
Apologies for the brevity,
Steven
__._,_.___ -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
- RE: [flexcoders] Cairngorm 2 Events ! Arghhhhhhhhhh ! Steven Webster
- Re: [flexcoders] Cairngorm 2 Events ! Arghhhhhhhhhh ! Jean-Luc ESSER
- Re: [flexcoders] Cairngorm 2 Events ! Arghhhhhhhhhh ! Tom Chiverton
- RE: [flexcoders] Cairngorm 2 Events ! Arghhhhhhhhh... Steven Webster