Don't have Flex 2 open in front of me ( client hearts 1.5 ), but you can I
think do:
public function onResult(event:* =
null):void
{
ResultEvent(event).result
// or...
var
yourEvent:ResultEvent = event as ResultEvent;
}
I can't
remember if you can cast in the function signature as:
public function
onResult ( event:* as ResultEvent = null )
...but, either way, you can
also do what I do; keep your own build of
Cairngorm locally! I've yet to
work on a project where the team didn't
modify their build of Cairngorm to
suit their needs.
----- Original Message -----
From:
"ben.clinkinbeard" <ben.clinkinbeard@gmail.com>
To:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com>
Sent:
Monday, July 03, 2006 3:00 PM
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm Responder
interface changes
Ah ha. Actually, I had to change them
to
public function onResult(event:* = null):void
public
function onFault(event:* = null):void
so that they matched the
signature exactly. I guess my confusion was
in that I was viewing the :* as
meaning the developer could specify
whatever type they wanted. I was seeing
* as a kind of superclass when
that is in fact not the case. I have to
agree with Jester; I don't
really see the point of this
change.
Thanks for your help,
Ben
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com,
"Clint Modien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> you need to
change these lines
>
> public function
onResult(event:ResultEvent):void
> public function
onFault(event:FaultEvent):void
>
> to
this...
>
> public function onResult(event:*):void
>
public function onFault(event:*)void
>
> On 7/3/06,
ben.clinkinbeard <ben.clinkinbeard@...> wrote:
> >
>
> Can someone explain why it is telling me I've implemented the
>
> Responder methods with an incompatible signature?
> >
>
> public function onResult(event:ResultEvent):void
> >
public function onFault(event:FaultEvent):void
> >
>
> The signatures shown in the docs are
> >
> > public
function onResult(event:* = null):void
> > public function
onFault(event:* = null):void
> >
> > What am I missing
here?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ben
> >
>
>
> > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com
<flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > "der_kotty"
<kotty.tm@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> >
>
> > > I was just wondering why the
com.adobe.cairngorm.business.Responder
> > > interface
has been changed since it has been released on Adobe Labs.
> > >
In Cairngorm 2.0 alpha (org.nevis.cairngorm.business.Responder)
the
> > > parameters of the onFault and onResult handlers were
typed events
> > > (ResultEvent and FaultEvent).
> >
>
> > > Why have the parameters been changed to '*'? Where is
the sense in
> > > that? To my opinion this is not really best
practice but maybe
> > > there's a really good reason for that?
Does anyone know?
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > >
David
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Yahoo!
Groups Links
