Re: [flexcoders] Re: WebService & Cairngorm 2 Example

Sun, 09 Jul 2006 09:50:33 -0700

I agree with Darron's changes. when could we expect to have those changes in the offical cairngorm release? (if the changes are approved)

On 7/6/06, Steven Webster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Darron makes some very fair points; our reasoning for the current Cairngorm implementation was driven from some findings we had during the beta, which no longer seem to apply.  We'll have some discussion internally to reinforce our decisions, but Darron's approach seems a sensible and valid one that we may likely end up bringing into the main codebase.  
 
How would folks feel about us making that change ?  We're always very reticent of API changes for backward compatibility.....would folks be ok with this one ?
 
Steven
 
Steven Webster
Practice Director (Rich Internet Applications)
Adobe Consulting
Westpoint, 4 Redheughs Rigg, South Gyle, Edinburgh, EH12 9DQ, UK
p: +44 (0) 131 338 6108
m: +44 (0) 7917 428 947 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard
Sent: 06 July 2006 16:07
To: [email protected]

Subject: [flexcoders] Re: WebService & Cairngorm 2 Example

Darron Schall just posted a great article about Cairngorm's Responder
interface and what he considers to be a better alternative.

http://www.darronschall.com/weblog/archives/000234.cfm




--
::| Carlos Rovira
::| http://www.carlosrovira.com __._,_.___

--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com




SPONSORED LINKS
Web site design development Computer software development Software design and development
Macromedia flex Software development best practice

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



__,_._,___

Reply via email to