Re: [flexcoders] Re: Flex and Server-Side Technology Recommendations

Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:11:35 -0700

Here´s a relevant link: http://blogs.adobe.com/mikepotter/2006/02/flex_and_php_us.html

On 7/17/06, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What about CakePHP alongside with CakeAMFPHP? It´s AMF0, but I´m very happy with that.


On 7/17/06, Tim Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:

Thanks Andy,

So CF would replace ASP.Net as the middle tier. I have no exposure
to CF, so that clears things up a bit. But, no native databases in
CF?

-TH

--- In [email protected] , "Andrew Trice" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>


wrote:
>
> Just want to make sure everyone is on the same wavelength here...
> ColdFusion is an application server, not a database. You can have
> ColdFusion running with SQL Server, MySQL, Oracle, etc...
ColdFusion
> can take advantage of this feature if you database will handle it.
>
>
>
> Although I'm not on the ColdFusion team, I agree with Tom.
ColdFusion
> is an extremely easy to use and productive server technology and it
> integrates very well with Flex.
>
>
>
> -Andy
>
>
>
> _____________________________________
>
> Andrew Trice
>
> Cynergy Systems, Inc.
>
> http://www.cynergysystems.com
>
>
>
> Blog: http://www.cynergysystems.com/blogs/page/andrewtrice
>
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

>
> Office: 866-CYNERGY
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected] ] On
> Behalf Of Tim Hoff
> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 5:09 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex and Server-Side Technology
> Recommendations
>
>
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> Thanks for the info. This is more of a CF question, but the CF-
Flex
> connection should afford a little bit of room here. Does CF
support
> what is called, "distributed partitioned views" like SQL Server?
> This allows you to create several small databases with the same
> structure that can be viewed as a single master database if
> desired. This is an essential feature for me. By segregating
> customer data into separate databases, the performance, by not
> having to weed through the entire database, is dramatically
> increased. In addition, for top level functionality, all of the
> customer databases can be queried as one. The reason that I ask,
is
> that several of my master tables can have multi-million records.
> Add to that a couple joins of these tables and the server has the
> potential to crawl. If CF has this feature, I will definitely
> consider switching; due to its tight integration with Flex.
>
> Thanks,
> Tim Hoff
>

> , "Tom Jordahl" <tjordahl@>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected]
> <mailto:flexcoders% 40yahoogroups.com> , "Kevin Mulvihill"

<kmulvihill@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > What do you all recommend for backend server-side technology
to
> work
> > with
> > > Flex? I'm planning on some work with MySQL and not particularly
> > interested
> > > in .NET.
> >
> > Hi Kevin,
> >
> > I would say that you should look at ColdFusion MX 7.0.2 as the
> premier
> > server side technology that closely integrates with Flex 2.
> >
> > Some advantages
> > - Application Wizard gives you a working Flex/CF app in minutes.
> > - Tight integration with the FDS Messaging and Data Mangement
> features
> > - Easy to use Flash Remoting support allows you to invoke
> ColdFusion
> > Components
> > - Its ColdFusion! The fastest, simplest and most productive
server
> > side scripting technology around.
> >
> > Disclaimer: I am (very) biased.
> >
> > --
> > Tom Jordahl
> > Adobe ColdFusion Team
> >
>



__._,_.___

--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com




SPONSORED LINKS
Web site design development Computer software development Software design and development
Macromedia flex Software development best practice

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



__,_._,___

Reply via email to