|
ooooOOOo ….. you got me! Yeah, you’re right .. :^) Ok, so then what do you suggest for
visually representing this aspect? Thanks! Evan From:
On 8/3/06, Evan
Gifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hey Alex, To visually represent what you've described, my best guess is
to put a gear shape in the "ContactVO" which has the label
"Business Logic", but then again what kind of Business logic is there
in this example really? I think what we're really talking about is a different,
"advanced" diagram, which would process more complex data types and
may even include more server-side technology like PDF generation, for instance. I'd really like to make this "basic cairngorm"
diagram as accurate as possible, but at the same time keep the use case very
simple so that it's more useful to more people. My concern with adding the "Business logic" to the
ModelLocator is that, at least in my mind, it makes the role of the command a
little more confusing whereas before it was fairly simple. (it actually did the
processing) I'm actually not the best person to make this decision, so
I'll need another definitive answer from you guys, and I'll happily incorporate
your decision into the design. (Steven? :^) -Evan From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hey there, first of all, I think it's great to see works like this done!
Can I just suggest a little improvment, though. I only see the
ModelLocator holding Value Objects. In my experience this means the actual
business logic (if there is any) would probably then either have to be in the
views or in the commands. Hovewer, I often see business logic in model
objects that can be accessed by ModelLocator. Model objects might contain Value
Objects. Your Commands could only be reusable requests to APIs of model
objects. I'd definitely suggest focsing more on model objects, which can
easily be unit tested etc. My latest blog entry has been about this topic: http://weblogs. Now, back to vacation. ;) Best, Alex
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com
Hey Russell! I'm finishing up this diagram ([flexcoders] Caringorm -
Visual Flowchart Poster!) .. and I sorted by subject so I missed your post,
sorry!! Anyway, you can see the flowchart here: http://www.undustri At this stage, I'd prefer if you submit color/shape/ Thanks! Evan From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you
would like to kick your visio chart over to me I would be happy --
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.5/403 - Release Date:
7/28/2006 -- Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.5/403 -
Release Date: 7/28/2006 -- -- Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.5/406 - Release Date:
8/2/2006
-- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
__,_._,___ -- -- |
- RE: [flexcoders] Re: Caringorm - Visual Flowchart Poster! Evan Gifford
- Re: [flexcoders] Re: Caringorm - Visual Flowchart Post... Ralf Bokelberg
- RE: [flexcoders] Re: Caringorm - Visual Flowchart Post... Evan Gifford
- RE: [flexcoders] Re: Caringorm - Visual Flowchart Post... Evan Gifford
- RE: [flexcoders] Re: Caringorm - Visual Flowchart ... Steven Webster
- RE: [flexcoders] Re: Caringorm - Visual Flowchart Post... Evan Gifford
- Re: [flexcoders] Re: Caringorm - Visual Flowchart ... Daniel Cascais
- RE: [flexcoders] Re: Caringorm - Visual Flowchart Post... Evan Gifford
- RE: [flexcoders] Re: Caringorm - Visual Flowchart Post... Evan Gifford

