Note to self: check wiki and docs before posting about known bugs.

Thanks Brian!

James

--- In [email protected], "Brian Deitte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is a known bug that is listed in the known issues on the ASDoc
> wiki.  I briefly investigated this, and I have no idea why it's
> happening.  Sorry, no workaround known.  It's a bug that we should fix
> for the next release.  -Brian 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] 
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Polanco
> > Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 3:34 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: ASDoc ignores Bindable properties?
> > 
> > Sorry, my last reply was not really clear with an example.  Here is
> > what I am seeing
> > 
> > package com.mysite.proj
> > {
> > 
> > [Bindable]
> > public class myClass
> > {
> > 
> > public var myString:String;
> > public var myObject:EventDispatcher;
> > 
> > .... methods and such
> > 
> > When I ASDoc this myString and myObject do not show up in ASDoc at
> > all.  If I remove the [Bindable] they do.  This is the problem that I
> > am seeing.  Is this technique still valid?
> > 
> > James
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], "Seth Hodgson" 
> > <shodgson@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi James,
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > Try putting your property documentation beneath the [Bindable] tag.
> > > E.g.:
> > > 
> > > [Bindable]
> > > /**
> > >  * ... your property documentation ...
> > > 
> > >  */
> > > 
> > > public function get propX():X { ... }
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > ASDoc comments apply to what they precede.
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > Best,
> > > Seth
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > ________________________________
> > > 
> > > From: [email protected] 
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > > Behalf Of james_dhap
> > > Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 11:28 AM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: [flexcoders] ASDoc ignores Bindable properties?
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > Hey All,
> > > I am seeing odd behaviour using the [Bindable] metadata tag in my AS
> > > classes. When ever my public properties have the [Bindable] 
> > tag ASDoc
> > > ignores them and does not generate comments. I first saw this with
> > > some of my ValueObjects that use the metadata at the root of the
> > > class, but even when I moved it to just one propety that property
> > > disappears from the docs.
> > > 
> > > At the moment its not a huge issue because its not really 
> > affecting my
> > > documentation, but it will very shortly. Any tips? Possible
> > > workaround ideas? Is this intended?
> > > 
> > > James
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > Flexcoders Mailing List
> > FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
> > Search Archives: 
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> >
>






--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to