|
For sure, this will come in later versions
of the Builder. Hmmmm.... maybe not ‘for sure’, but I truly hope so! From: I think they've gotten stricter
on package usage now. Only places I see it now are in the package
and import
statements. After converting 50 odd classes this week, I must admit it's
cleaned the code up a bit. What I don't get is why we have to
manually type import statements at all. It would be nice if Flex Builder (or
the compiler itself) could pre-process the source and insert the appropriate
imports for you, as well as when using Source > Organize Imports, and just
prompt you for any clashing classes. That'd be kinda neat. That way the imports
are always complete and always nicely formatted, and lots of silly compiler
errors are avoided. Robert From: I can’t say “why”, but import IS mandatory, per the docs (migration
pdf?), and the fully qualified path should only be used for “disambiguation”. From: Hi, Just a small actionscript question. I have the following interface definition: package a.b.c { public interface SecurityWebservice { function
findUser(userId: } } It does not compile (1046: Type was not found), which I find
strange since I specify the fully qualified name of the type. When I include the statement ‘import d.e.f.UserDto;’ it compiles.
Can someone explain why this is? Thanks, Franck -- -- -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
SPONSORED LINKS
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe __,_._,___ |
- RE: [flexcoders] Why is import mandatory? Franck de Bruijn
- RE: [flexcoders] Why is import mandatory? Franck de Bruijn
- RE: [flexcoders] Why is import mandatory? Franck de Bruijn
