Re: [flexcoders] Re: [Flex 2] Strange behaviour when using RSLs

Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:41:52 -0700

Mike,
It might make sense to have separate folder in SDK with all the libraries compiled without debugging for size/performance reasons. Realistically, every production application would like to benefit from that and subjecting everybody to Ant process  - especially given the additional libs like fds, rpc, etc that come without sources. Please let me know if I should file feature request or if it is already done.
Sincerely,
Anatole Tartakovsky


 
On 9/28/06, Mike Morearty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Are you changing them to be external, rather than statically linked
into your app? Because if you're leaving them statically linked into
your app (the default), then there is no need to recompile them with -
debug=false; at link time, if linking the release swf, the linker will
strip out all of the debug information.

If you are changing them to be external, then... take a look at
frameworks/build_framework.xml (an Ant script). I haven't tried it and
don't know much about it.

--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Anatole Tartakovsky"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Mike,
> Is there way to get standard libraries (framework, rpc, flex, etc)
built
> with -debug=false
> Thank you,
> Anatole


__._,_.___

--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com




SPONSORED LINKS
Software development tool Software development Software development services
Home design software Software development company

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Reply via email to