|
> This is (i think) why they are stored in a different place, it
might even help prove performance (again, i think). You're right on both counts. This is a major reason why ActionScript 3
is faster than ActionScript 2. - Gordon From: Hello, Its not that the concept of the for..in loop has changed (i think), but
the way classes are defined internally has changed. Properties and methods of classes that are defined inside the
class definition will not change at runtime. This is (i think) why they are
stored in a different place, it might even help prove performance (again, i
think). So for the runtime player they are actually something else then the
dynamic properties of an object (or an array). I hope this helps in any way. Greetz Erik -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
SPONSORED LINKS
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe __,_._,___ |
- RE: [flexcoders] var in Loop Gordon Smith
- Re: [flexcoders] var in Loop Mayur Bais
