No. I tried that too. Having a third radio button whose visible property is set to false, that looks for a value of 'null' or '' or whatever I choose the third value (besides 'Yes'or 'No', works fine but seems like unnecessary work.
Has anyone solved this differently? I could use a single checkbox, but people are used to separate yes and no radio buttons, and they're also not going to see the difference between false and null in this case. Thanks, Jack --- In [email protected], Tom Chiverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday 23 November 2006 00:01, jack_freud wrote: > > labels of the two RadioButtons I have), then thought it would be even > > cleaner to have the DB stored proc translate the value from the bit > > field to 'Yes', 'No' or 'null' so the binding statement would be simple. > > Does '' work better than null ? > > -- > Tom Chiverton > Helping to seamlessly repurpose clicks-and-mortar systems > > **************************************************** > > This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. > > Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at St James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF. A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by the Law Society. > > CONFIDENTIALITY > > This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008. > > For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com. >
