Thank You Lachlan!!! I can't believe this isn't documented somewhere..... Seems like a pretty basic thing.
Anyway, glad to know I'm not going crazy.. On 12/5/06, Lachlan Cotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think you're right Steve. I have asked myself the same question in the past and ended up using bindProperty… When you say *function set ():void*or function *get ():Something *you're really telling the method to masquerade as a property, so it makes sense that you can treat it as such. I have used * BindingUtils.bindProperty* to bind a setter method and it seems to work. Cheers, Lach On 04/12/2006, at 4:31 PM, Steve Hindle wrote: Sorry for reply to myself - but this is driving me _nuts_! I can't find an example of bindSetter with a 'real' accessor function with either yahoo or google. And the example on the 'bindUtils' page at adobe.com (stuck in the comments at the bottom) - doesn't bind to a 'function set blah'... (isn't that the _required_ to consider a funciton/method a 'setter' ??) It just binds to a 'normal' function. Anyway, I'm starting to think that 'bindSetter' is really a poorly named 'bindFunction' and that _all_ properties - var OR accessor based should be using bindProperty. Can someone confirm/refute this and save my sanity please! Thanks
