I had not thought of that, and your right the .search() is detecting
it as a regex expression. Being I can't expect the end user to
understand to type \(###\)###-#### to filter phone numbers is there a
simple way to make it ignore the characters and not take it as a regex?


--- In [email protected], "Doug Lowder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Seems like the (, ), and * are being interpreted as regexp 
> quantifiers.  You can escape them if you want them treated as 
> literals.
> 
> http://livedocs.macromedia.com/flex/2/docs/00001904.html#118959
> 
> --- In [email protected], "camlinaeizerous" <camlinae@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > I have a list of phone numbers in either a (###)###-#### of
> > ###-###-#### type format. There is also a text box that on change
> > filters array collection that populates the list. The code breaks 
> down to.
> > 
> > private function phoneFilter(item:Object):Boolean
> > {
> > if(item.Phone.search(searchBar.text) >= 0)
> > {return true;}
> > else
> > {return false;}
> > }
> > 
> > the 5 phone numbers that i randomly put in the collection are are
> > #1)"123-456-7890"
> > #2)null
> > #3)"(403)734-4312"
> > #4)"(780)495-4949"
> > #5)"(780)828-4229"
> > 
> > the #1 and #2 phone number filters as expected however the ones 
> with
> > the brackets are awkward.
> > "(", "(780", "780)", "(780)828" fail not as I expected
> > "(780)", "780" succeed as I expected
> > 
> > And tossing in random "*" succeed definitely not as I had expected
> > "(780)*82" matches #5
> > "(780)*8" or even "780*4*4*4*4*4*4*4*4*4*4*4*4*4*4*4*4*4*4*4*" 
> matches
> > #4, #5, and #1
> > "(780)*", or "(spam)*" match all 5 numbers
> > even "()*" or "(###)*" where # is any 3 numbers and it matches all 
> 5
> > numbers again even the null.
> > even "(828)" matches #5 or similar ideas
> > 
> > Obviously the "(", ")" and "*" characters are doing something 
> strange
> > to the search() function. Hopefully someone can explain why I'm 
> seeing
> > this behavior with these characters or a way to change how I'm
> > filtering the phone numbers to get somewhat normal behavior.
> >
>


Reply via email to