I would like to say that I feel strongly that jd has been poorly treated and wrongly insulted a number of times in this thread.
I'd also like to suggest that allowing link spidering to dictate the future of content indexing may be shortsighted. It's convienient, but it gets worse every year as a way of finding information. Ten years ago Alta Vista was the stuff, today it's Google, but the nature of search engines is such that any year Google could find itself replaced by something else, rss being a perfect example for a specific kind of info. Also, as a side note, as advertisers and marketers optimize the hell out of their information, it gets harder to find real information on Google (and not have the first 5 pages of a simple query return only links to products). The natural progression is that that will continue until something else takes over the role. I realize that in many cases it makes sense to go with the flow for either marketing or technical reasons and that google is a useful tool, but it's far from the endgame on indexing information. I do agree that it would be in Adobe's interest to make publishing well tagged information easier with built in components, tools, examples and specs, but it's really going to be hard for them to do something like that by themselves. They are probably better off waiting for developers to articulate the problems and brainstorm solutions until it's clear what they could do to help. Just my thoughts, not to be taken to seriously, but my real purpose of commenting here is that I don't think jd was well treated and I wanted to mention that.
