Solved my problem.

Searching through this list, I found others having the same problem.   For the 
original 
solution, read message #60420 from Paul Evans.  Thanks Paul.

The problem is caused by re-using the workspace from the Beta version.

Here's how I fixed mine:

Create a new folder for your Flex projects.

Go into Flex 2.0.1, under the File menu, choose Switch Workspace.

Aim it at the new folder.

Drag the project folders from the beta projects folder into your new projects 
folder.

Under the File menu, choose Import for each of your projects.

You should be good to go.

Tom


--- In [email protected], "Tom Sobut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Jason,
> 
> I checked all three .as files you specified.  All are there and are dated at 
> the time of my 
> 2.0.1 install.
> 
> I had installed the full Flex version, so I've not used Eclipse directly, 
> although I do have 
3.2 
> installed from last June.
> 
> Tom
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Jason Hawryluk" <jh@> wrote:
> >
> > Could you if verify that the files exist in your application directory (not
> > sure with mac)
> > 
> > Yourpath\Flex Builder 2\Flex SDK 2\frameworks\source\mx\core"
> > 
> > FlexModuleFactory.as
> > IFlexModuleFactory.as
> > IFlexModule.as
> > 
> > And are you both trying this with eclipse 3.2? I'm thinking that if you both
> > upgraded to the 3.2 even if you uninstall there may be the java files that
> > are not compatible with flex on mac just a guess of course.
> > 
> > I really have no idea here just throwing out thoughts as they come to me to
> > try and pin point a direction, please bear with me.
> > 
> > Jason
> > 
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la
> > part de Tom Sobut
> > Envoyé : mercredi 10 janvier 2007 20:31
> > À : [email protected]
> > Objet : [flexcoders] Re: IFlexModule
> > 
> > 
> > My compile errors looked a bit different. I created a new project folder
> > named Test201.
> > Added an HBox and a Button. Compiled. Here are my compile errors:
> > 
> > Severity and Description Path Resource Location Creation Time
> > Id
> > 1144: Interface method create in namespace mx.core:IFlexModuleFactory is
> > implemented
> > with an incompatible signature in class _Test201_mx_managers_SystemManager.
> > Test201 line 7 1168442502096 13267
> > 1144: Interface method create in namespace mx.core:IFlexModuleFactory is
> > implemented
> > with an incompatible signature in class _Test201_mx_managers_SystemManager.
> > Test201 line 7 1168442502093 13266
> > 1023: Incompatible override. Test201 line 11 1168442502088
> > 13265
> > --- In [email protected], "Greg Morphis" <gmorphis@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Severity and Description Path Resource Location Creation Time
> > Id
> > > 1023: Incompatible override. aopscheduler line 11 1168453153048
> > 2221
> > > 1120: Access of undefined property IFlexModule. aopscheduler
> > line
> > > 22 1168453153048 2222
> > > 1144: Interface method create in namespace mx.core:IFlexModuleFactory
> > > is implemented with an incompatible signature in class
> > > _index_mx_managers_SystemManager. aopscheduler line
> > > 7 1168453153063 2224
> > > 1172: Definition mx.binding:RepeaterComponentWatcher could not be
> > > found. aopscheduler line 16 1168453155423 2226
> > > 1172: Definition mx.core:IFlexModule could not be
> > > found. aopscheduler line 6 1168453153063 2225
> > > 1180: Call to a possibly undefined method
> > > IFlexModule. aopscheduler line 24 1168453153063
> > 2223
> > >
> > >
> > > On 1/10/07, Greg Morphis <gmorphis@> wrote:
> > > > Okay I'm fed up....
> > > > I removed Flex Builder 2 entirely, the newly installed 2.0.1 and the
> > > > older installed 2, and I removed FDS2 also... I just reinstalled
> > > > Eclipse (unzipped the WTP zip file to the C: drive) and just ran the
> > > > FB2.0.1 installer. I chose default options for both questions.
> > > > Before going any further I wanted to test it.. so I started Eclipse
> > > > and guess what? There's the error!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> > > >
> > > > On 1/10/07, Greg Morphis <gmorphis@> wrote:
> > > > > It screwed up my old install of FB2.0/Eclipse3.1... I decided to go
> > > > > back to using that temporarily, so I loaded up Eclipse3.1, the
> > > > > Navigator view was empty!
> > > > > I right clicked, chose Import and chose my workspace. My projects were
> > > > > present in the dialog and were all checked. I hit finish and was told
> > > > > the projects existed.. If they did, I couldn't see them in the
> > > > > Navigator view...
> > > > > This sucks Adobe.. sucks....
> > > > >
> > > > > On 1/10/07, Tom Sobut <tom.sobut@> wrote:
> > > > > > I'm having the same problem...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In the 2.0.1 install instructions for the Mac, Adobe instructs that
> > it's necessary to
> > "refresh
> > > > > > the workspace by using the -clean option". I followed the links in
> > the
> > instructions and did
> > > > > > a refresh in a terminal session by entering:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /Applications/eclipse/eclipse -clean &
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That did seem to run. Problem still exists.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I can compile without errors back in my 2.0 beta copy which I kept
> > (just in case).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Something's wrong inside the black box.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hope someone can help here.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Greg Morphis" <gmorphis@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I downloaded Eclipse 3.2 (the all in one wtp package), Flex 2.0.1.
> > I
> > > > > > > did a clean install in new folders. Now when I open Eclipse and
> > open a
> > > > > > > project I'm getting some IFlexModule error.. I did a google search
> > and
> > > > > > > that didnt help much. Has anyone seen this error and know how to
> > fix
> > > > > > > it? It's getting on my nerves!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Flexcoders Mailing List
> > > > > > FAQ:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
> > > > > > Search Archives:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to