On Wednesday 17 January 2007 19:20, Tariq Ahmed wrote: > I know FDS being required wasn't done for the hell of it, but > architecturally it should have been an option that provides extra benefits,
You'd have thought so. > those who know me, I'm Flex's biggest fan. It feels like the Flex > management/marketing team's nature is to assume that most companies are > mega enterprises with monster budgets. In the land of Flex, any new That was certainly the way Flex was sold initaly remember. I think things have changed, and Adobe probably have a fairly sound reason for requiring FDS (async command push to the and pull from player maybe). -- Tom Chiverton Helping to administratively benchmark best-of-breed e-tailers **************************************************** This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at St James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF. A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by the Law Society. CONFIDENTIALITY This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008. For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com.
