I think you misinterpreted, the TestVO is a java class. Coding it correctly should not affect the Flex versions of the class. When the bean is transfered to Flex it will contain publicly accessable properties representing the private members that have public getters, ie if you have getData there will be a property data on the transfered object. That is how Java Beans work. If this convention is not followed then if you start working with Enterprise level projects you run into problems.
--- In [email protected], "Doug Lowder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Flex wants a public constructor with no arguments available, so the > solution is to just add your second constructor with whatever > arguments you want while keeping the default constructor. That > would make both of the folowing valid: > > TestVO vo = new TestVO(); > TestVO vo = new TestVO(rs.getInt("id"), rs.getString("data")); > > It may arguably be bad form to access data members directly, but > strict adherence to good Java form in value objects just leads to > problems on the Flex side. If, for example, you went the full route > and declared your data members private to force the use of accessor > methods, your Flex object would contain no properties since Flex > would have no visibility to the private members. I usually just let > it slide, and create a Java "good form" wrapper object if I must for > accessing on the server side. > > Doug > > --- In [email protected], "ytseshred" <ytseshred@> wrote: > > > > That was a typo on my Part. They are being set using methods: > > > > TestVO vo = new TestVO(); > > vo.setID(rs.getInt("id")); > > vo.setData(rs.getString("data")); > > > > The problem has been solved by casting the result to > ArrayCollection > > using the as keyword. > > > > I'm not sure what was causing my first problem, but I originally > had > > my VO's defined with constructors, so I could create the VO like: > > > > TestVO vo = new TestVO(rs.getInt("id"), rs.getString("data")); > > > > But Flex gave a runtime error when it was constructing the array > > collection saying something like TestVO init expected 2 arguments > and > > got 0. > >
