oh ok, now i understand, thank you for the code example!

greetings
marty



--- In [email protected], "Gordon Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Only the second class -- the one that dispatches the event by calling
> dispatchEvent() -- needs to extend EventDispatcher. You don't need to be
> an EventDispatcher to listen to events.
>  
> The dispatching class must declare [Event] metadata if you want to write
> listeners in MXML.
>  
> If your first class -- the one that listens -- is written in AS, you
> register for the event by calling addEventListener():
>  
>     instanceOfDispatchingClass.addEventListener("someEventType",
> myEventHandler);
>  
> You would normally do this immediately after creating
> instanceOfDispatchingClass.
>  
> - Gordon
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Paul DeCoursey
> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 6:56 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [flexcoders] Re: eventdispatching between 2 classes
> 
> 
> 
> Your classes would need to extend EventDispatcher. Then they can use
> the dispatchEvent function to dispatch events. To receive events you
> either need to put event listeners directly on the class or on the
> SystemManager. If you put the listener on the SystemManager then you
> need to make sure the event bubbles. If you need a specific example I
> can try to work one up.
> 
> pd
> 
> --- In [email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
> , "martywolf11" <martywolf@> wrote:
> >
> > hello,
> > 
> > i have 2 classes which i want to interact with eachother by events.
> > my first class creates a second class, which reads out a mysql table.
> > when the results come in, it should send an event to my first class.
> > 
> > how do i create the eventhandling between those 2 classes, since both
> > of them must refer to the same event instance?
> > 
> > i read the flex language reference already and did research in the
> > internet but didnt find any results.
> > 
> > 
> > thank you
> > 
> > 
> > greetings,
> > marty
> >
>


Reply via email to