Chaitanya,

Depending on what you are doing with FDS you could more than likely use Red5
in its place. Red5 is now supporting AMF3 with remoting and RTMP sockets. It
also does video and audio streaming, which FDS doesn't do. We have been
building a few applications using Flex2 and Red5, and so far things have
been going well. One thing to keep in mind though, is that Red5 is still
pretty new and still under heavy development. At any rate, you way want to
look into it as it's an open source solution.

I'm one of the leads of the project so of course I'm coming at this with a
bias. Just want to clarify that before some people jump all over me for
suggesting Red5.

Best of luck.

-Chris

On 2/23/07, Chaitanya Mutyala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

  thanks jayson

but my system uses and requires multiple CPU machines.

-Chaitanya


On 2/22/07, Jayson <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>
>   This is copied right from the Adobe download page for Flex and FDS
>
> Flex Data Services 2 Express
> A powerful solution for creating data-intensive rich applications.
> The Express edition is a free, non-expiring commercial-use product
> for applications deployed on a single machine with no more than one
> CPU.
>
> --- In [email protected] <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>,
> "chaitanya raja"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hmm.. I guess you could classify this as a rant. Anyways, here it
> goes.
> >
> > Could someone please suggest what i could do.
> > Consider, I am a small software firm and I create a product which i
> > sell to different companies. I think Flex and FDS provides me a
> really
> > good implementation of part of my product. There are other options
> > available for the functionality, but I do like Flex. But then
> again,
> > should i pay the huge sum that FDS costs me for every sale I make? I
> > think this is not fair.
> >
> > This is my understanding of the licnesing for FDS. Let me know if
> its
> > not so. Also do let me know if I have any other alternative
> licensing
> > options available for FDS.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Chaitanya
> >
>
>

Reply via email to