Jamie, you can try out FlexBuilder for free (I think for 30 days) to
help decide whether it's worth it.
 
- Gordon

________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Adam Pasztory
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 11:06 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Quick Flex 2.0 questions



I just took the plunge and purchased FlexBuilder after spending a lot of
time exploring other options (OK, you can call me stingy).  The existing
FlashDevelop solution was too problematic in my opinion, and there's no
indication about when FD3 will be out.   And unless you're a big fan of
command line in general, it's probably not going to cut it for you. 

After having played around with FB for about 2 days, I realize the
decision was a no-brainer.  The design mode is excellent.  I was able to
throw together nice-looking UIs for unit testing within a matter of
hours.  The AS coding support is on par with FlashDevelop.  So far my
favorite new feature is that the editor adds in "import" statements for
you automatically when you declare a var using that data type.  I love
clever little features like that. 

-Adam


On 2/23/07, Jamie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: 

        Thanks for the info guys, that's exactly what I need.  I'm
definitely
        going to download the demo of Flex Builder and play with it.  I
        suspect I'll end up buying it if my prototypes with Flex prove
to
        work the way I expect them to.
        
        I have to say, I'm really excited to "discover" Flex.  I was
trying
        to figure out a solution for this project via AJAX and it just
wasn't
        working.  Even using all the latest stuff, the web UI just
couldn't 
        match the desktop app that this web app needs to replace.  I had
        talked with the client about using Flash, but as a developer, I
        always found developing apps for Flash really difficult.  I had
no
        idea you guys were working on essentially a UI/App framework for

        Flash.  What a great idea!  From what I've seen so far, it seems
like
        the way to go for rich web app UI.
        
        I'm excited to see what I can do with Flex.  Thanks!
        
        Jamie
        
        
        --- In [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> , "Gordon Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
        >
        > > I'm assuming that Flex retains the Flash socket ability to
        > communication over TCP/IP?
        >
        > Yes. All Flash Player 9 APIs (the flash.* packages) are
available in 
        > Flex.
        >
        >
        > > If all I want to do is deliver a Flex Flash app on the
client that
        > talks to a back end server over TCP/IP, I
        > don't need to be paying for Flex Data Services, correct? 
        >
        > Correct.
        >
        > > There are no licensing fees to distribute regular Flex
        applications?
        >
        > Correct.
        >
        > > If I want to do some simple 2-D pie charts, will I need to
buy the 
        > Adobe Flex Charting?
        >
        > Yes, unless you want to write your own 2-D pie charts.
        >
        > > Or is ther some basic charting built into Flex?
        >
        > There is not.
        >
        > > How much easier is it to build a Flex app with Flex Builder
than 
        with
        > the SDK?
        >
        > The three main advantages of FlexBuilder are:
        >
        > * code hints and code completion that make writing MXML and AS
code
        > easier and faster
        > * visual debugging instead of command-line debugging with fdb 
        > * design view for doing visual layout
        >
        > I've heard developers say that FB pays for itself pretty
quickly,
        but
        > since I work for Adobe I'll let other recommend whether you
should
        buy
        > it or not. We love having SDK-only developers just as much as
those
        > using FlexBuilder.
        >
        > - Gordon
        >
        >
        > ________________________________
        >
        > From: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> 
        [mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> ] On
        > Behalf Of Jamie
        > Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 2:01 PM
        > To: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> 
        > Subject: [flexcoders] Quick Flex 2.0 questions
        >
        >
        >
        > I am architecting an RIA that needs to be able to connect via
        TCP/IP
        > to a back-end server. I've looked at a lot of technologies,
and 
        Flex
        > 2.0 Flash seems to be the best front end solution.
        >
        > 4 questions:
        >
        > 1) I'm assuming that Flex retains the Flash socket ability to
        > communication over TCP/IP?
        > 
        > 2) All of the extremely expensive licensing for Flex Data
Services
        > has me a little spooked. If all I want to do is deliver a Flex
        Flash
        > app on the client that talks to a back end server over TCP/IP,
I 
        > don't need to be paying for Flex Data Services, correct? There
are
        > no licensing fees to distribute regular Flex applications?
        >
        > 3) If I want to do some simple 2-D pie charts, will I need to
buy 
        > the Adobe Flex Charting? Or is ther some basic charting built
into
        > Flex?
        >
        > 4) How much easier is it to build a Flex app with Flex Builder
than
        > with the SDK? I'll probably just download the trial and find
out 
        > myself on this one.
        >
        > Thanks!
        >
        
        
        
        
        ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
        
        --
        Flexcoders Mailing List
        FAQ:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt> 
        Search Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
<http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> 
        Yahoo! Groups Links
        
        
            (Yahoo! ID required)
        
            mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
        
        
        
        


 

Reply via email to