And furthermore, what's the point of having that method? I would assume the
point of a util function would be to aggregate several common steps, but it
seems to me like they just changed name?
Array.indexOf() == ArrayUtil.getItemIndex() (functionality-wise)
So, what's the deal?
Troy.
On 16 Mar 2007 07:39:31 -0700, Arul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Looking at mx.utils.ArrayUtil class I'm wondering why it does not make use
of native method Array.indexOf for getItemIndex() method. I'm thinking
native method should be faster
public static function getItemIndex(item:Object, source:Array):int
{
var n:int = source.length;
for (var i:int = 0; i < n; i++)
{
if (source[i] === item)
return i;
}
return -1;
}
Is there a specific reason? If so, I would like to know
Thanks & Regards,
Arul
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
