For sure the client/Flash Player can handle whatever you need it to.
The Flash Player is extremely fast at non-visual processing. We have
packed incredible amounts of logic into the client, I'm talking 30,000
plus lines of code.  Most is not visual, but that much code does take a
bit of time to DL the first itme.  But once it gets to the client
response is lightning fast. FP7 was fast FP8+ is 30% faster

 

So don't sweat the client capability.

 

Tracy

 

________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kevin
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 8:08 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [flexcoders] What to do on the server, what to do in Flex?

 

I have a continuous debate with myself about what to accomplish with
server code and what to accomplish internally with FLEX.   My decisions
currently are mostly based on my skill level in each language and which
language makes the process the easiest. However, I am wondering if there
are better reasons to make these decisions.

 

For example, if I am going to gather some XML data...should I?

 

1) Load the XML directly into Flex (URLRequest) and then convert the XML
to objects in Flex.

 

2) Load the XML in PHP and then convert to PHP objects and send to Flex
(AMFPHP).

 

For some reason, I lean towards doing all parsing and object translation
on the server and only sending objects back and forth to Flex, however,
I don't know if this is because of my experience with Flash RIA's that
use to often get stuck in timeout loops.  On the other hand, I have a
friend who always says "anything you can do on the client, do on the
client..."  Conceptually, I understand this, but in real life I don't
know how this plays out.  My thinking is usually that the flash player
is more limited that the server.

 

Anyone have any thought about this?  I would say my apps generally fall
in the middle of the spectrum.  They don't deal with millions of records
or millions of users, but they also are not small single user widgets.  

 

Thanks for your insight.

 

- Kevin

 

Reply via email to