OK well I'm I guess one or two lines from making the 'simple' version 
work. When I hard-code the following in my thumbChanged method, it 
works...well if loading the same image no matter what thumb you click 
means it works LOL:

Application.application.galleries_module1.imagetabs.bigImage.source="a
ssets/galleries/CD2.jpg";

But when I try to grab the proper {data.piclink} which corelates to 
the thumblink after clicking (i.e., the right image in the XML file), 
I get, well, nothing, not even an error LOL...but no image 
either...it DOES make the broken image link go blip, but it doesn't 
load. Here's what I am trying to do, but please keep in mind, with 
this sort of thing, I still have absolutely no idea what I'm doing 
yet (the source code in the HBox works, but my thumbChanged method is 
frying):

        <mx:Script>
        <![CDATA[

            import mx.containers.HBox;//???
            import mx.core.Application;
            //import mx.core.Application;
            
                        [Bindable]
            public var selectedThumb:XML;

            // Event handler for the Tree control change event.
           public function thumbChanged(event:Event):void {
            
        Application.application.galleries_module1.imagetabs.bigImage.s
ource="{data.piclink}";
            
        Application.application.galleries_module1.thumbloader.thumbSer
vice.send();
            
        //Application.application.galleries_module1.imagetabs.bigImage
.source="{data.piclink}";
                //selectedHBoxItem=HBox(event.target).selectedThumb 
as XML;
               //Application.application.thumbService.lastResult.galle
ry.piece.piclink.url=selectedThumb.piclink;
             // parentDocument.thumbloader.thumbService.send();
             //Application.application.thumbService.send();
          };

            
            
        ]]>

    </mx:Script>

<mx:HBox click="thumbChanged(event);"
              id="thumbbox" width="100%" height="100%" 
verticalAlign="middle" verticalGap="0"
      verticalScrollPolicy="off" horizontalAlign="center" 
backgroundColor="#000000" backgroundAlpha="0.0">
   <mx:Image   id="img" source="{data.thumblink}" 
horizontalAlign="center" verticalAlign="middle" height="75%"/>
</mx:HBox>
</mx:Canvas>

As usual, the source is available if I'm clear as mud...I'd really 
appreciate any help here, because I've spent all weekend on it and 
I'm just totally lost: 

http://www.shawngibson.com/faceitphoto.ca/shawn/index.html

(click the "Galleries button", anything else will probably blow up...)

Shawn

--- In [email protected], "Tracy Spratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, also Application.application will give you a reference to the
> top-level application.  As I said in my other post, there are many 
ways.
> 
> Tracy
> 
>  
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of shawn.gibson
> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 6:15 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Unbelievably embarassing question - making
> components talk (and modules) amongst
> 
>  
> 
> I'm sure it goes deeper than this (if you'll pardon the pun), but 
if 
> you add 'parentDocument' to your parent (i.e., 
> parentDocument.thumbloader.etc you get the kind of thing I'm 
hoping, 
> at least for component-to-component-from-within-the-same-module.
> 
> I typed the name of the error message into the help screen. Go 
> figure :S
> 
> Shawn
> 
> --- In [email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%
40yahoogroups.com>
> , "shawn.gibson" <shawn.gibson@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks to Tracy's earlier help, I was able to get at least the 
ugly 
> > (i.e., my) version of HTTPService going (and I'll revisit it to 
> > Tracy's specs one I figure this here problem out), but in order 
for 
> > me to do it, I had to de-compartmentalize all my code. In other 
> > words, I have originally been using an approach where each 
> > major 'page' was a module loaded into a state of my main app, and 
> > each major chunk of a module was made of a custom component (the 
> > entire Tree, it's code, the little stuff; or the entire thumbnail 
> > with all it's itemrendering in a HorizontalList...etc)- nice 
> > separation of code, easy to understand in 6 months, and no 6,000 
> line 
> > files. Also offered me a fighting chance in the future to figure 
> out 
> > model, control, and view separation.
> > 
> > But for me to get (for example) the tree component I made to 
> > communicate with the thumbnail component, both housed in the 
> > galleries module, I had to hardcode the components back into the 
> > module (i.e., they are no longer components), so the module is 
now 
> > one big-ass file that has no components, they are right in the 
> file. 
> > 
> > I can't go on like this, it's just too ugly. As a designer and a 
> poet 
> > wannabe, that sucks LOL.
> > 
> > But I can't for the life of me get things to talk amongst 
> themselves, 
> > say my module has 3 custom components doing their things...how do 
I 
> > access something in one component from another component?
> > 
> > I became very afraid when I realized there doesn't seem to be any 
> > kind of AS2/Flash dummy-movie approach - loadMovie ('thisthing') 
> into 
> > dummyclip instance 'whatever' and suddenly you just say 
> > whatever.thisthing.stuff, and you've gained access to everything. 
> In 
> > other words, you can jump up and down as long as you know the 
> scope. 
> > I haven't a clue what the equivalent is in Flex 2.
> > 
> > It's very embarassing. I refuse to get through this weekend 
without 
> > figuring it out. I'm not botching my gallery project by having 5-
6 
> > modules (as I DO want) but with thousands of hardcoded chunks 
> within 
> > them, when each module should by rights have nice piecemealed 
> (sorry 
> > for the word) custom components doing their thing from their own 
> file 
> > and from there communicating with each other. I need to use 
> > components in the modules for my own sanity, and even worse, how 
do 
> I 
> > get one module to talk to another module's objects, functions, 
etc.?
> > 
> > In a word, you can't go from:
> > 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> > srv.send();
> > 
> > ...strip it out into a component and then call the id of the 
> parent, 
> > i.e.:
> > 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> > thumbloader.srv.send();
> > 
> > ...you get "Access of undefined property thumbloader" for your 
> > troubles...
> > 
> > You can't back up a generation like you could with Flash. Or if 
you 
> > can, I'm missing big bits of the puzzle.
> > 
> > Any suggestions, other than take a chill-pill?
> > 
> > Thanks guys,
> > 
> > Shawn
> >
>


Reply via email to