Yes, but could an RSL not also be a swf used across multiple modules?
On 03 Apr 2007 16:54:37 -0700, Bjorn Schultheiss < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My definition would be that Modules are used to split a single application into multiple SWF's while RSL's are swfs used across multiple applications. B On 04/04/2007, at 3:04 AM, Collin Peters wrote: I am wondering if modules have taken over all the functionality of an RSL? From what I can tell, using Modules with load-externs and link-report should be able to split an application up into many SWFs, and reduce file size. Or are RSLs still required in order to have a separate library. What I am looking to have is a shell application, which loads various modules, but all of those modules should be sharing the same common code/classes from a library SWF (or SWFs). Collin
