FDS 2 does not require types to implement Serializable. The value of serialVersionUID really should be generated using the serialver command line tool that ships with the JDK... which is a pain to do each time you add a new class. If you don't need them to be Serializable, then I suggest not implementing this interface.
________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 9:15 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [flexcoders] is Serializable needed? I guess it can't hurt to have them Serializable. I'll add the static final. Thanks, Kevin On May 9, 2007, at 9:02 AM, Sean Sell wrote: I don't don't know about hibernate but I'm pushing some object onto a JMS topic and they need to be serialized. to get rid of your error add to your class: public static final long serialVersionUID = 1L; you only need to update the version ID with changes if you actually store the serialized version and want make sure your not loading and old one. ----- Original Message ---- From: Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2007 8:47:13 AM Subject: [flexcoders] is Serializable needed? do java classes need to implement java.io.Serializabl e for use with FDS/Hibernate? If not is there another reason to do this? Eclipse keeps giving me warnings whenever I implement this? "The serializable class AddressVO does not declare a static final serialVersionUID field of type long" Thanks, Kevin ________________________________ Food fight? <http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/index;_ylc=X3oDMTFvbGNhMGE3BF9TAzM5NjU0NTE wOARfcwMzOTY1NDUxMDMEc2VjA21haWxfdGFnbGluZQRzbGsDbWFpbF90YWcx?link=ask&s id=396545367> Enjoy some healthy debate in the Yahoo! Answers Food Drink Q&A. <http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/index;_ylc=X3oDMTFvbGNhMGE3BF9TAzM5NjU0NTE wOARfcwMzOTY1NDUxMDMEc2VjA21haWxfdGFnbGluZQRzbGsDbWFpbF90YWcx?link=ask&s id=396545367>
