Neither, it's a known requirement. CF has the concept of "named arguments" versus ordered arguments. A single Object is seen as a name-value map for named parameters. Pete
________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jamie Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 11:47 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [flexcoders] Flex or CF bug? I blogged an issue I came across yesterday. In short, I'm saving some data, passing it through a RemoteObject call to a CFC... var leadInfo:Object = new Object(); ... ro.saveLeader(leadInfo); Doesn't work, but var leadInfo:Object = new Object(); ... ro.saveLeader(leadInfo,1); does, though the second argument is just a dummy. I did everything I could think of, but I was only able to get the object into the CFC's arguments scope by having that dummy. http://codingmurloc.wordpress.com/2007/05/15/passing-object-to-a-cfc-fle x-or-cf-bug/ <http://codingmurloc.wordpress.com/2007/05/15/passing-object-to-a-cfc-fl ex-or-cf-bug/>
