Hi,

WebOrb have released a free version which should satisfy most users
who need .NET back ends.

Regards

Mark

--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Jurgen Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Mark,
> 
> Seeing that you want to use ASP.NET, WebORB would be the way to go. It 
> is pricey and Midnightcoders would make a killing if they would reduce 
> the pricing for it as more firms would jump on the boat.
> 
> I've been working with WebORB and must say that the tools that come
with 
> it beat everything else out there in terms of rapid application 
> development. You get a fully implemented code generation module with
it, 
> which is irreplaceable.
> 
> All that you really need to concentrate on is writing your class 
> libraries in .NET and create the services and DTO objects on the Flex 
> side and you're done. Can't get easier than that.
> 
> Jurgen
> 
> 
> Mark Ingram wrote:
> >
> > Hi Barrie, thanks for the response.
> >
> >  
> >
> > In terms of collaboration, anything will do. I tried a great example 
> > using Flash Media Server 2, which was a chat client. Each client was 
> > informed when a new client joined or typed a message. That's exactly 
> > what I was looking for, as we created one the other week that was 
> > based around polling. It worked, but it wasn't elegant.
> >
> >  
> >
> > The price tag on FMS seems steep too (not compared to FDS!). $4000
for 
> > 150 concurrent users? Or more users if you throttle their bandwidth.
> >
> >  
> >
> >  
> >
> > The ideal solution for me would allow data-push and be able to 
> > communicate with ASP.NET. I have looked at WebOrb, but again, $10,000 
> > per CPU is a little high.
> >
> >  
> >
> > So here are the options as I see it:
> >
> >  
> >
> > Flex Data Services (LiveCycle Data Services): $20,000 per CPU
> >
> > Midnight Coders Data Services: $10,000 per CPU
> >
> > Flash Media Server: $4,000 per 150 users (unthrottled)
> >
> > Polling WebServices: Free (plenty of development required though)
> >
> >  
> >
> > Another down side of FMS is that you can't develop in Flex Builder? 
> > And from what I've seen it doesn't use ActionScript 3?
> >
> >  
> >
> > I feel awfully confused about all these similar products! Based on my 
> > requirements, what would be the best option (see above)?
> >
> >  
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >  
> >
> >  
> >
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > *From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > *On Behalf Of *barry.beattie
> > *Sent:* 21 May 2007 15:22
> > *To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> > *Subject:* [flexcoders] Re: Am I using the right technology?
> >
> >  
> >
> >
> >
> > Hang on a sec...
> >
> > in giving Mark an answer, he's been landed with more jargon.
> >
> > Mark, I'm nowhere near the expert that Tom or others here are on this
> > subject ...
> >
> > ... and there are some good blog posts around (and the Adobe site
> > itself) with decent detail on all of it ...
> >
> > but... I work at a university and they're forever going on about
> > collaboration, whether it's research partners, academics or student
> > teams. I'm hunting for a project to put this into practice...
> >
> > (in a nutshell) both remoting and webservices follow the typical
> > request/response. so any sync'ing of data needs polling so the clients
> > can find out if server has new changes.
> >
> > but FlexDataServices (or LiveCycle DS now-a-days) has a handle back to
> > each client from the server so it can push events/notifications
> > telling the clients that the server's data has changed.
> >
> > this gives a pretty powerful hub-type configuration where one client
> > commits updates on the server which can be sent back to all the other
> > clients in a heartbeat.
> >
> > however, this is NOT peer-to-peer collaboration. the server is
> > definitely in the middle of it all, receiving and broadcasting to
> > subscribers. Which is OK if the data/documents/whatever is to be
> > persisted and managed on the server. Keep in mind, that sort of
> > technology isn't cheap - not compared to webservices...
> >
> > I'm no expert on all of this and I've got my own issues trying to work
> > out how flex can do true peer-to-peer collaboration (no FDS). I'm also
> > unsure what the upgrade path will be with our FlashMediaServers (FMS)
> > while I wait for ColdFusion8 (and it's reported LCDS and FMS
integration).
> >
> > but I do hope that's helped somewhat. Others can chime in with much
> > better replies. this is just something quick to help lift the fog.
> >
> > what sort of collaboration do you need to do?
> >
> >
>


Reply via email to