"* is just like Object"
I couldn't disagree more.
I really dislike that Object is referred to in the docs about *. There is an
implication there that they are similar when they really aren't.
This is a sore spot for me everytime I use Array.pop() and Array.shift() in
the Flash IDE. Both of those functions have their returns typed as Object.
Why? Someone thought it was a good idea because you can have any type
returned ... Well, no. Yes, you can have any type returned at runtime, but
you can't actually type the return variable to anything except Object or
nothing.
For example, the Array.as file in the Flash 8 Classes folder defines:
function shift():Object;
If you try to do this you will get a compiler error:
var arr:Array = new Array(3);
var n:Number = arr.shift(); << compiler error
The same holds true in AS3. For example:
function go():Object
{
return 'something';
}
Everything's valid here. Setting the return type to Object allows me to
return any type that subclasses Object, which is everything.
var s:String = go(); << compiler error
"Implicit coercion of a value with static type Object to a possibly
unrelated type String."
The compiler doesn't swing that way!
So Object and * are NOT interchangeable. And the difference isn't subtle.
Use Object when you want to actually use generic objects and * when you want
to dynamically-type something.
On 5/18/07, Peter Farland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
See:
http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/2/langref/specialTypes.html#*
The type * is just like Object but it can also store values that are
undefined. Object can only store null.
It's useful to determine whether a dynamic property actually exists on a
type and just happens to be null, or whether it literally is not defined
on that type.
________________________________
From: [email protected] <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:
[email protected] <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>] On
Behalf Of Adam Pasztory
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 2:42 PM
To: flexcoders
Subject: [flexcoders] star (*) data type vs. Object
Can anyone tell me what the difference is between setting a generic
variable's data type to Object and setting it to *. Are they
equivalent?
I tried to search for the answer, but it's hard to do a search for *. :)
thanks,
Adam
--
Derek Vadneau
