WebORB for .NET Standard (free) was just updated to include AFM3 doing
RPC. You may have an easier time implementing your paged solution with it.
May be worth taking a second look at it.
Jurgen
Shaun wrote:
Aww, what about us non-FDS guys, Matt? :-( Protecting the FDS
revenue stream I take it? Actually, I would love to use FDS, but
unfortunately this app requires a .NET backend and doesn't have the
budget for FDS or WebOrb anyway.
Oh well, time to start coding... :-)
Shaun
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>, "Matt Chotin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> FDS will do some of this work for you automatically, one reason why
we
> didn't write an updated version of the blog post :-)
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>] On
> Behalf Of Shaun
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 2:32 PM
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: {Disarmed} [flexcoders] Data Paging a la Matt Chotin
for
> Flex 2.1
>
>
>
> Jurgen,
>
> Thanks for the tip. I checked them out, but unfortunately, those
> implementations don't address my main issue: getting the data from
the
> server in a paged fashion. They simply allow you to view an
> arraycollection in chunks, where Matt's goes back to the server as
> needed to get chunks of the data.
>
> With 150k records, I need the on demand paging.
>
> Shaun
>
>
> --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>, Jurgen Beck <jurgen@> wrote:
> >
> > Hey Shaun,
> >
> > You may want to check out the FlexBox components list. There are
two
> > components, one for a paged DataGrid, the other one for a paged
> > ArrayCollection.
> >
> > http://flexbox.mrinalwadhwa.com/ <http://flexbox.mrinalwadhwa.com/>
> >
> > Jurgen
> >
> > Shaun wrote:
> > >
> > > I am getting ready to implement a report for a project that
requires
> > > the user to be able to sift through a maximum of 150,000 records
> from a
> > > table (yes, we all know that in reality this is ridiculous, but
we
> also
> > > know that customers get what customers want).
> > >
> > > I read through Matt Chotin's posts on large datasets and will
likely
> go
> > > down that path, but I'm in a time cruch and so the hope of
saving
> some
> > > time, I am curious as to whether anyone has already ported ! his
> samples
> > > to 2.1 as they are from way back in 04.
> > >
> > > Or, if anyone has a better option, I'm all ears.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Shaun
> > >
> > > Matt's post:
> > >
>
http://weblogs.macromedia.com/mchotin/archives/2004/05/large_data_sets
<http://weblogs.macromedia.com/mchotin/archives/2004/05/large_data_sets>
_2
>
> > >
>
<http://weblogs.macromedia.com/mchotin/archives/2004/05/large_data_set
<http://weblogs.macromedia.com/mchotin/archives/2004/05/large_data_set>
s_
> 2>
> > > .cfm
> > >
> > >
> >
>
