Michael, thanks for your reply. Actually I have already realized that the applications with strong reference map correctly. But it's so weird that I thought there could be something like this: DataService.mapClass(Sale); Adobe should take a look at this.
On 5/29/07, Michael Herron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Have you strongly reference the *com.beans.Sale* class in your Application? Your RemoteClass meta-data looks fine, but if you've not got a hard reference to the class inside your flex app, it won't be compiled in to the SWF and won't be mapped correctly at runtime. You can get round this by just adding an unused variable somewhere of type com.beans.Sale. (there maybe a more elegant way to get round this). ------------------------------ *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *André Rodrigues Pena *Sent:* 28 May 2007 12:48 *To:* [email protected] *Subject:* [flexcoders] RemoteClass Hi all, I have a Java service that returns an ArrayList of type Sale. At the Flex application I also have the type Sale, the simplifyed version is this: package beans { [Managed] [RemoteClass(alias="com.beans.Sale")] public class Sale { public var id:int; public var customer:Customer; public var product:Product; } } Although, when I trigger the RemoteObject to retrieve the ArrayList of Sales (ICollectionView at client), Flex seems to be treating it as a collection of Object, not Sale. Is this conversion (Object -> Sale) to be done automatically? What's wrong? thanks -- André Rodrigues Pena LOCUS www.locus.com.br
-- André Rodrigues Pena LOCUS www.locus.com.br
