Tom Chiverton wrote: > On Thursday 07 Jun 2007, Christopher Olsen wrote: > >> Well if we want to add bloat an html render would be nice since the >> IFRAME hack is above the player itself >> > > Why does the Flash player (that runs in a browser) need a HTML renderer ? > OK, so RichTextEditor has issues, but no one is seriously that bothered, are > they ? > I think there are a lot of people who don't get that the Flex application doesn't need to take up the whole screen. It, like Flash, can just be a part of the page and can communicate with other bits on the page. One Flex app can even talk to another on the page. With that in mind I don't think an HTML renderer is important. I also think that the RTE is fine, if you need complex HTML then you should be coding it and not using a WYSIWYG anyway.
-- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
