AFAIK, in object oriented languages, an object itself is never
destroyed setting to null a pointer that refers to it (and it doesn't
get "overwritten" when assigning that pointer to another instance).

In some OOL (C++) you have to make an explicit call to destroy in
order to free the memory allocated by an object. This can lead to
memory leaks if pointers are reused / go out of scope without calling
destroy.

Mordern languages (Java, .NET, ActionScript) are usually
garbage-collection based, so you don't need to destroy anything.. a
garbage collector is automatically executed in background by the VM,
tracing object instances that are not referenced by any pointer yet,
and destroying them.

Bye
Cosma

--- In [email protected], "Ravi Kumar Gummadi"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 
> Hi all
> 
> How does flex handle parameter passing, as I understand, it is by Pass
> by reference. But I was having some memory leaks and playing around a
> few tweaks and the following snippet completely took me by surprise.
> 
> // CODE START
> 
> <script>
> 
> public var obj:Object;
> 
> createObject(){
> 
>       obj = {test:"1234",test2:"5678"};
> }
> 
> checkObject(objParam:Object){
>       trace(objParam);
> }
> 
> deleteObject(objParam:Object){
>       objParam = null; // I tried objParam = undefined as well
> }
> 
> </script>
> 
> <mx:Button id="create" click="createObject()" />
> <mx:Button id="check" click="checkObject(obj)" />
> <mx:Button id="delete" click="deleteObject(obj)" />
>  
> // END 
> 
> Now 1. I created the object by click on create
>     2. Then check for the existence of it (Traces [object object].. This
> is fine)
>     3. Then clicked delete. 
>     4. Then again click on check... (Traces [object] [object]
> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! But since its passed by reference it should be
> NULL)
> 
> 
> Somewhere I read that it setting to NULL changes the reference count,
> does that mean in each of my function I need to set all the params to
> null at the end of it so that refercne count is reduced and raady for
> garbage collection!! ( That doesn't quite a sense !!)
> 
> Regards
> Ravi
>


Reply via email to